Gnosis: The Not-So Secret History of Jesus
Jonathan Phillips
[The Electric Jesus] • By popular request, I'm attempting to convert my Electric Jesus presentation into a book. Here's my first shot at the first chapter.
I always begin "The Electric Jesus" workshops with a simple, yet extremely revealing visualization about our life-long journey of acquiring knowledge in the West.
Let's start by taking a look back at your first day of school. Perhaps your parents packed you a sack lunch, tied your shoelaces, buttoned up that yellow rain jacket and then walked you to the bus or drove you to that strange large building with lots of windows. Remember your preschool or kindergarten teachers and how they trained you on the basics of the alphabet? You learned the fundamentals of reading, writing, and arithmetic. The stakes escalated as you went through each grade. There was telling time, cursive, the national anthem, fractals, history, even a little earth science. The hormones eventually kicked in at middle school or junior high and you embarked on new adventures involving facts, dates, and important events. Algebra turned into quadratic equations, which morphed into trigonometry and possibly calculus. Perhaps you went to college and sat through lectures, labs, novels, tests, papers, even a thesis or two. You might have gone on to do post-grad work acquiring various degrees and doctorates. And after years and years of study, from adolescence to adulthood, did a heroic teacher or professor ever set down the chalk or turn off the overhead projector, look your class square in the eye and say something like this?
"Look guys, we teach you all these things but none of us really have a clue what’s going on. Here we are, six billion humans, living on a bluish green sphere we call Earth. We’re a little speck spinning through an unimaginably vast cosmos, and none of us can even answer the most basic questions of our lives: Who are we? Where did we come from? Where we are going? And what is the purpose of this fourteen-billion-year experiment we call the universe?”
In my workshops, I’ll occasional hear tales of a Socratically wise teacher who had the gumption to admit that all we know is that we really know nothing. But by and large, there seemed to be a gaping blind spot, active denial, and severe intellectual arrogance with our educational systems and institutions towards understanding the actual world we live in every day. With all the cost, time, resources, and energy it takes to put our youth through this extended learning process, our students invariably come out of it full of information but knowing very little at all.
Fortunately, in our Western culture there is a Christian tradition (actually many diverse traditions, as we’ll soon learn) that believes it is our birthright to learn the answers to these crucial questions about our own existence. According to this tradition, we only need the perseverance, guidance, openness, love, and spirit (pneuma) to find the Truth we’ve always (although sometimes unknowingly) been looking for. From the evidence, it appears that they understood the most fundamental wisdom we could ever obtain in our lifetime -- knowing who we truly are! These wise spiritual seekers and teachers of have been called “The Gnostics.”
The word gnosis means "knowledge through direct experience or personal revelation." It’s not something you can be told from a teacher, minister, or politician, nor can it be learned from a newspaper or book, or even the global mind of the Internet. It’s something you must experience first hand. There’s nobody who can do it for you, and there’s absolutely no exception. For instance, I can tell you that Paris is the capital of France. It has a population of about ten million people. The city boasts wide attractive avenues with some classy old buildings. Its residents like croissants and cafes and they still generally smoke too much for their own good. I can tell you all these things but the only way to truly know Paris is to have actually been there and experienced it yourself. The same goes for higher states of consciousness, or "the kingdom of heaven," as Jesus would put it. And it’s the same for knowing ourselves and our own true nature.
In the Gospel of Mark, Jesus makes a rather remarkable promise: "There is nothing hidden that won’t be brought to light nor anything secret that won’t be revealed" (4:21). According to him, all the secrets and mysteries of God, the universe, and our own origins don’t have to be guessed at or alluded to, but will actually be known to us in time. And just as importantly, these mysteries would, quite literally I believe, be brought to "light," which is a concept we’ll be expanding on throughout this book.
According to the ancient Gnostics, nearly all of the citizens of "Spaceship Earth" have fallen into a chronic case of cosmic ignorance, which they described as "forgetfulness," "drunkenness," or "sleep." We are lost in the world of illusion and have forgotten our true origins beyond the material world. The Buddhists and Hindus called this the veil of Maya, Plato called this the shadows of the cave, and Neo mainstreamed the concept by calling it "The Matrix" on wide screen theaters around the world.
So who were these Gnostics, and how were they able to break through this veil to "wake up?" A mistake I often witness is that people tend to separate Christians from Gnostics, as if they were two distinct groups, but the evidence overwhelmingly shows that the earliest Christians were, indeed, Gnostics. They were one and the same. (In fact the label “Gnostic” was created by academics in the later part of the 20th Century.)
You don’t often hear this in Sunday school, but Christianity comes from a very deep spiritual lineage known as the mystery schools. These were ancient mystical initiatory religions where seekers would pass through various rites of passage as they matured on their spiritual path. At first, those on the outer circle would be taught that the religious stories they were told really happened, but as they progressed into the esoteric inner knowledge (gnosis), they would learn that these tales served as an allegory for their own spiritual journey and process, and mimicked the rites and rituals they’d encounter along the way. The most common rites of the mystery schools play out in the drama of Jesus’ own story. There’s a baptism (spiritual cleansing), a eucharist (communion), an anointing ("Christ" means "the anointed one"), and the death and resurrection ritual, something every mature initiate would eventually go through.
Jesus tells us himself about these secret teachings when talking to the disciples:
"You have been given the secret to heaven, but to those outside everything is presented in parables so that they may look with eyes wide open but never quite see, and may listen with ears attuned but never quite understand. Otherwise, they might turn around and find forgiveness" -- Mark 4:12.
As Jesus constantly reminds us, we are not witnessing the present moment correctly, because if we did, we would see through the fog of illusion, find forgiveness, and remember who we truly are. Those of us on the “outside” have not been adequately trained by the inner mysteries to see the greater reality around us, so we must learn through enigmatic allegories until we complete the various stages of gnosis. "Jesus said, 'It is to those who are worthy of my Mysteries that I tell my Mysteries'" (The Gospel of Thomas).
The mystery schools were strewn across the lands of the Mediterranean and are thought to have originated in Egypt centuries before Jesus made his messianic debut in Nazareth. Each of these schools prominently featured “a dying and resurrecting godman.” In Egypt they revered Osirus and Horus, in Greece it was Dionysus, in Syria Adonis, in Asia Minor Attis, in Persia (and later Rome) Mithras. The similarities amongst these mythic figures are uncanny. Most of them were born on December 25 (around the winter solstice) to a virgin in humble surroundings (a manger or a cave) with a star in the Eastern sky. They grew up to be spiritual masters with twelve disciples, performing miracles, turning water into wine, giving baptisms and communions, and then dying for three days before making a glorious comeback. Often, they were referred to as "the son of the lamb," "son of God," "king of kings," "the light of the world," and "the alpha and the omega." [1]
"Son of God" is actually derived from "sun of God," as the mystery schools carefully marked astrological events, especially the precession of the equinoxes. The twelve tribes represent the twelve constellations in the zodiac and Jesus, Mithras, Dionysus and the other "godmen" symbolize the sun, which eventually passes through each of the signs. On December 25, the brightest star in the night sky, Sirius, aligns with the three brightest stars in Orion's Belt, which are called "The Three Kings," pointing directly at the sunrise. The Virgin (Mary in our case) is the constellation Virgo, who was also referred to as "The House of Bread" (she holds a sheaf of wheat). She represents the autumn months, which diminish and later give birth to the sun's reawakening. The little legendary town of Bethlehem literally means "House of Bread."
As winter comes in, the sun falls further south in the horizon until reaching its lowest point at the winter solstice on December 22nd. There, it appears to die for three days (stops moving) directly under the Southern Cross constellation until it rises again on December 25, bringing in more light to our world each day. The sun’s resurrection wasn’t fully celebrated until it reached fruition during the spring equinox, or what we call Easter today. Those "crown of thorns" are thought to represent the sun's vibrant rays. Given the subtle, yet powerful spiritual/energy forces the mystery schools were working with (which we'll discuss in greater detail), it's no surprise that their spiritual heroes were symbolized by the continual nuclear fusion process of our glowing sun.
Different mystery school figures represent different ages of the Zodiac, each of which lasts about 2,150 years. Mithras kills the bull as we move away from Taurus into the age of Aries (the ram), then Jesus comes along with baskets full of fish to usher in the age of Pisces. When the disciples ask where the next Passover will be, Jesus says, “Behold, when ye are entered into the city, there shall a man meet you bearing a pitcher of water… Follow him into the house where he entereth in.” Any novice astrologer will recognize the water bearer as Aquarius. When we hear of “the end of the world” in the New Testament, it actually translates as “the end of the age,” which isn’t that terrifying when you realize that the authors are poetically marking the change in the star calendar, and perhaps new energies coming in and affecting our planet. [2]
Given the astrological significance of the southern cross, it’s not surprising that depictions of crucifixion were popular in the mystery schools. A famous second to third century talisman (see image above) depicts a figure that looks suspiciously like Jesus crucified on a cross, but is surprisingly labeled “Orpheus becomes a Bacchoi.” Orpheus was a prophet in the Dionysian mysteries and a Bocchoi was an enlightened disciple who had completed the stages of initiation. (The first depiction of Jesus on the cross wouldn’t show up until at least 200 years later.) Around the same time as the talisman, a Roman graffiti artist drew a bizarre picture on the back of a Roman pillar when the authorities weren’t looking. This ancient “tag” featured a donkey being crucified on the cross, symbolizing the rite of dying to one’s lower nature in order to ascend to the higher self. Bible students will immediately recognize this as being reminiscent of Jesus riding a donkey into Jerusalem, revealing in allegory how we can master our own animalistic nature.
Even if you’ve never been to church, I’m sure you’ll recognize the following inscription: “He who will not eat of my body and drink of my blood, so that he will be made one with me and I with him, the same shall not know salvation.” This familiar reference to the communion appears on a Mithraic temple. The mysteries of Mithra were around centuries before our favorite resurrecting “godman” hit the religious circuit in Galilee. Here’s a common prayer in Mithraic services: “Be good of cheer, sacred band of Initiates, your God has risen from the dead. His pains and sufferings shall be your salvation.” The Mithra mysteries were spread across the Roman Empire and you’ll find temples in London and up north at Hadrian’s Wall where Roman soldiers were stationed. The Vatican itself sits on top of a destroyed Mithraic temple, where initiates once shared a meal of wine and bread celebrating their redeemer, born on December 25th, who died for three days before coming back to life. [3]
While we're shedding light on forgotten history, I'd like to take a moment and make up for what I call "2,000 years of really bad translations." Let's start off with that all-important Christian word "savior." It's a Greek term, soter, meaning “bestower of health,” or even better, “one who makes whole.” Jesus heals throughout the New Testament but what are his miraculous techniques? Some evidence might be found when he comes across a woman "with a flow of 12 years" who reaches out and touches his garments. "The power drains out of him," for which Jesus turns around, gives the thumbs up, and says, "Your faith has healed you."
But how could the power drain out of Jesus? And what is this power? Could it be that he was using the same power that moves the whole cosmos? Was he vibrating at a higher level and like a supreme Reiki master, did he heal her by passing on these higher frequencies? Jesus constantly gives "hands-on healings" throughout the gospels, often telling us "be opened" when cleaning out the energy channels and clearing out sickness. As a true soter, Jesus actively utilizes the powerful healing properties of unconditional love and forgiveness to help make us whole with ourselves, one another, and the divine.
To continue our discussion of really bad translations, I'd like to tackle that extremely loaded word we call "sin." The term harmatia comes from Greek archery, and quite literally means “missing the mark.” But wait, you say, this word isn’t riddled with the shame and guilt that the televangelists lay on us before asking for our credit card information? You’re right, it's just a word describing our journey home. Sometimes we fall off target, then we have to realign and get on the road again. That's how we stumble through the darkness of illusion and eventually find our way back to the light.
So it seems highly unlikely that you would go to hell for "missing the mark," or at least not that place of eternal damnation that sidewalk preachers rage about. The translation for hell actually comes from the word Gehena, which was a place in Israel where trash was burned. A spiritual master like Jesus understood the laws of karma and knew that if you do bad things, you might, metaphorically speaking, end up in a trash dump for a while until you figure things out. How many of us have been in Gehena at some point in our lives? And I’m sure for some of us, it felt like an eternity. Of course, we could "repent" to improve our situation, especially since the Greek word metanoia simply means to "change one’s mind" or better yet, "to have a change of consciousness," which can happen quite easily when you meet a higher vibrational being like Jesus. I’ve had the fortune of meeting several fairly enlightened people in my lifetime, and can honestly say I left their presence with a changed sense of consciousness.
And what about that fabled goateed guy with the red pointy tail? The term "Satan" comes from the Hebrew word for "adversary." In our minds and mythologies, we’ve built Old Scratch up to be a wily demon tempting us into horrible corruption, but those on the path will recognize the real adversary to us reaching our destination of true knowing. It's the ego/personality attachment to this world of illusion, or as the Gnostics called it -- the eidolon, that we must overcome in order to experience our higher self. Once we've accomplished that through years of spiritual alchemy, we can then "resurrect" (anastasis), literally "rise from sleep," to become fully awake and aware beings in the cosmic dream.[4]
The Buddha's ears might be heating up right as you read this, as his name also means "The Awakened One." Could Jesus and Buddha be pointing towards the same direct experience? Might Jesus’ "Kindgom of Heaven" be the same as Buddha's "Ultimate Reality?" I had my suspicions.
During “The Electric Jesus” workshops, I always give a little pop quiz. And I admit it's a bit of a trick, but here it goes… What is the earliest Christian gospel that we know of?... Matthew perhaps? Even though it's placed first in the Bible, it wasn't written until 80 - 90 AD. Then how about Mark, you may ask? Good guess. It's the oldest of the canonical gospels (60 – 70 AD) but there’s another gospel even older than that and it happens to be one of the most poetic and compelling spiritual texts in the world, right on par with The Tao Te Ching and The Bhagavad Gita. We call it The Gospel of Thomas (40 AD). The text is known as a “secret sayings gospel” and you'll find many of these sayings conveniently inserted into the narrative of the canonical scriptures.
This gospel starts off with a startling, jaw-dropping promise: "Whoever discovers the interpretation of these sayings will not taste death." You only have to read a few lines further down to find another impossible line: “Heaven is inside and outside you. When you know yourselves, then you will be known, and you will understand that you are children of the living father."
Once again, forgiveness, heaven, and knowledge of our true self does not exist in cloud nine far above; it's right here inside us and around us, just waiting to be explored. Jesus goes on to tell Thomas, "I am not your teacher. Because you have drunk, you have become intoxicated from the bubbling spring that I have tended." Could it be that Thomas obtained a similar spiritual mastery as Jesus, and might that "bubbling spring" refer to waves of energy that were passed from teacher to initiate in energetic transmissions that maintained the spiritual lineage of these esoteric traditions? Moving water has often been a symbol of energetic waves or transmission. Just look at the rite of baptism, which Jesus executes with "fire and spirit."
Perhaps the most mystically complex saying in the whole gospel is the following lines: "When you make the two into one, and when you make the inner like the outer and the outer like the inner, and the upper like the lower, and when you make male and female into a single one… then you will enter the kingdom of heaven." In this passage, Jesus becomes a yogic guru, advising us in a spiritual alchemy that unites the polarities and duality of the universe in order to discover our divine origins and go back home. It's a mastery that seems logically impossible, and only the magic of divine gnosis can bring us to this kind of realization.
Along with Thomas, an enormously diverse number of Gnostic gospels and sacred texts flowed through the numerous Christian mystery schools, some of which can still be ready today. There’s The Gospel of Mary, Philip, Judas, Secret James, Secret John, The Gospel of Truth, Act of Peter, Pistis Sophia, Dialogue of the Savior, Tripartite Tractate, and the lists goes on and on. If you’re curious about the best way to sink your teeth into these vast tomes, I’d start with Thomas for the wealth of sayings, then Philip for the sacred rites and rituals of the Christian initiates, then Mary to prove that a girl can do everything Jesus can. If you'd like to bone up on the basic history and beliefs of the Gnostics, I highly recommend starting off with Elaine Pagels' concise academic study in The Gnostic Gospels, then delve into the rich and expansive The Jesus Mysteries by Timothy Freke and Peter Gandy.
If early Christianity was extremely diverse with dozens of gospels and various Gnostic traditions spread across the Middle East, you might be asking yourself, “What happened to change all this?” Like most of the problems in history, we may be able to pin this one to the horrors of war. With the Roman Empire smashing Jerusalem and its Second Temple in 70 AD, the whole region was in violent tumult. The Romans considered secret or hidden societies dangerous hotbeds of rebellion and Christians, with their radical hero figure, found themselves at the top of this list. Members of the Christian mysteries joined the mass exodus out of the country to avoid persecution while many of the initiation schools fractured into pieces. (A similar tragic situation is happening to the Mandeans, the last remaining Gnostic lineage, who are being persecuted due to the war in Iraq.)
Initiates were spread far and wide and those who no longer could experience the deeper mysteries and inner gnosis started up “Literalist Churches,” which taught the Jesus story as absolute historical fact rather than allegorical representation. The remaining Gnostic circles called these rigid churches “Imitation Churches,” as they did not teach the real meaning of the mystery traditions -- “the Christ within.” Literalist Christianity began to rise in places like Rome and France, where they encountered a good deal of persecution from the Roman power structure. But in a sad touch of historical irony, leaders of these new literalist churches became heretic hunters attacking those who still carried the inner teachings of their own religion.
In the second century AD, Irenaeus, the infamous bishop of Lyon, wrote the rather uptight Against Heresies to discredit those he saw as his Gnostic opponents. This work almost single-handedly shaped the Orthodox faith and set forth nearly 2,000 years of very lame behavior by what would become the Catholic hierarchy. Suddenly the word heresy (from the Greek haeresis, meaning “choosing”) was mainlined and used at will to attack and deny any teachings that did not fit in with the growing institutions of power. The drafting of Against Heresies was a serious turning point in the history of Christianity, the moment when the once more popular inner traditions lost traction to the growing Literalist Church. Irenaeus immediately began a crusade to narrow the diverse wealth of Christian texts to a paltry four stories. [5]
As the number of Christians multiplied in Roman lands, a power-hungry Emperor Constantine switched the state religion to this mass movement, uniting Rome under “one God, one religion,” and yes, one emperor. In 325 he oversaw the Council of Nicaea, where Literalist Church leaders completed Irenaeus' dull vision of wiping out all Christian written knowledge to a slim few texts. This is what we now call The New Testament.
Now imagine, this would be the equivalent of free-minded Americans handing over their Declaration of Independence, The Constitution, the Federalist Papers -- the whole basis of our civil liberties -- back to King George in England and saying, “Hey, could you edit these and get back to us?” Of course, many of the most inspiring, liberating, and empowering spiritual texts never saw the light of day in the “old boys club” back in Nicaea. And after completing his long business trip, the now Christian ruler Constantine celebrated his return home by immediately killing both his wife and son. He then remained unbaptized until his deathbed so that he could continue his murderous ways and still secure box seats in heaven.
In 391 Emperor Theodosius passed an edict to close all “pagan” temples and burn their books. Christians hordes set out on murderous rampages smashing all traces of the spiritual traditions from which their religion had blossomed. The last of the Gnostic circles were annihilated, as were libraries, temples, texts, and the spiritual gnosis that had been passed down throughout the ages. By 410 AD the Roman Empire had nearly torn itself apart and the Visigoths strolled in to finish the job. Only eighty-five years after the Council of Nicaea, the Dark Ages had begun.
But, as the old adage states, “Nothing lasts, but nothing is lost.” In December 1945, as the world was ending its darkest and most destructive period to date, an Egyptian peasant named Mohammed Ali Samman was digging for fertilizer around some limestone caves near the village of Nag Hammadi when he came across a sealed earthenware jar. He feared an evil djin (genie) might be inside, but eventually opened the jar in hopes to discover lost riches. Disappointment set in as twelve raggedy leather bound codices fell out of the jar. He had no idea of the priceless treasure laying at his feet. In its 1,200 pages, The Nag Hammadi Library, held dozens of sacred texts that had been hidden away for the last 1,600 years. In it were numerous Gnostic gospels and treatises that had been lost to the brutal dustbin of time. Mohammed brought them home where his mother stayed warm by feeding pages of those ancient texts to her fireplace.
Fortunately, they didn't all get burned into ash and these lost texts can now be enjoyed by anyone with access to Wikipedia, Amazon.com, or a local bookstore: There’s fifty-two in all including: The Gospel of Thomas, Secret James, The Gospel of Philip, The Origin of the World, The Gospel of Truth, The Exegesis on the Soul, Secret John, The Three Steles of Seth, The Gospel of the Egyptians, The Prayer of the Apostle Paul, The Tripartite Tractate, and The Sophia of Jesus. As you can see from these numerous titles, early Christianity was an extremely rich, open, and inclusive tradition when it came to gnosis. The Nag Hammadi Library even includes texts from the Corpus Hermeticum and Plato’s Republic.
To conclude, I have to say that I’ve been absolutely amazed by how many people are awakening to a greater vision themselves and the cosmos, whether through spontaneous openings or engaging in serious spiritual endeavors. Mass transformation of human consciousness seems to be increasing exponentially all around us as record numbers of seekers practice the techniques of yoga, Reiki, Thai Chi, meditation, and much more. While we embark on this noble journey, it's important to integrate the traditions we grew up with and not just push them away, especially if we want to become whole. As Jesus says in The Gospel of Thomas, "If you bring forth what is within you, what you bring forth will save you. If you do not bring forth what is within you, what you do not bring forth will destroy you."
Regardless of your religious upbringing or current practices, Christianity is within all of us. It's in our language, our laws, our mores, our sexuality, even our calendar, deeply influencing our entire perspective on the world. The gnosis of these newly discovered texts provide a mystical bridge between our own unfolding personal transformation and the cultural forces that ground us and identify us in our shared reality. They offer a place to heal, forgive, and embrace our religious traditions while clearing up the mistranslations and misunderstandings of the past. We no longer are limited to looking toward the exotic East for knowledge of the deeper mysteries in life. Like Dorothy, we can click our heels three times, and discover we've actually been there all along.
1. Timothy Freke & Peter Gandy, The Jesus Mysteries (New York: Three Rivers Press, 1999), 1-26
2. Peter Joseph, Zeitgeist: The Movie (2007), http://zeitgeistmovie.com, Part 2
1. Timothy Freke & Peter Gandy, The Jesus Mysteries (New York: Three Rivers Press, 1999), 1-3
4. Richard Smoley, Inner Christianity: A Guide to the Esoteric Tradition (Monterey, MA: Bma Studios), Discs 1-2 on audio-book
5. J. Michael Matkin, The Complete Idiot's Guide to The Gnostic Gospels (Indianapolis: Watermill Books, 2005) 23-24)
- Jonathan Phillips's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version




Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Propeller
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Icerocket
'world'?
"According to the ancient Gnostics, nearly all of the citizens of "Spaceship Earth" have fallen into a chronic case of cosmic ignorance, which they described as "forgetfulness," "drunkenness," or "sleep." We are lost in the world of illusion and have forgotten our true origins beyond the material world. The Buddhists and Hindus called this the veil of Maya, Plato called this the shadows of the cave, and Neo mainstreamed the concept by calling it "The Matrix" on wide screen theaters around the world."
How do you understand what they meant by "beyond the material world"?
And notice the limits of their knowledge! For unknown to them, in the 'New World', were Indigenous peoples who very well were not at all 'asleep' and 'lost in the world of illusion' and were rather far more interrelated with the other species and the Land and universe than the dogma-battered peoples the Gnostics etc were familiar with within the confines of what they knew.
You make a good point, zezt.
not in Kansas
anymore,like living in the material world, oh the yellow brick road, yes the Wizard of OZ, the prototype for the Demiurge, the creator of the world.Or divine mind? However the Gnostics saw it in another light, as spirit trapped in the material world.Can we imagine the world in which the early gnostic communities were plunged in, we can say that the early "Christian" communities were also Gnostic communities.But something is missing here, why is there still a discrepancy here, what is the line drawn between Gnostic, Gnostic Christians, and just Christians? Are the Nag Hammadi documents all products of the now Christian Gnostics?IT seems that we must see certain groups as "Christain" Gnostics, around the time that Rome made an offical Christian religion.And this language of a healer, an anointed one, a sun to the world, somehow becomes Christianized.So if there were early communities that were "Christian" Gnostic, then at what point was the word Christian added?
When were the gnostic words, added to a Christianized gosple? It gets all mashed up, in a moment when the Gods of Rome were in decline, and a vexed Emperor needed a plan, the plan, the plan, Ah yes, we will steal the words of the Gnostic rag tag groups, and salt them with old God language, toss in some Hebrew translations, and mix but don't stir, and presto chango, The Roman Catholic Church.And some two thou years later we will let some magic coptic find the Nag library(the Naz and the Nag in the same bag).And Now we can really toss alchemic salt into the old rift wound, and all the symbolism will get so mish mashed, that people will still talk about some revolutionary that got hung on a tree.Or two beams of wood, we can get Mel Gibson, yeah, and then the mystery will gather more baggage as the Empire that never died, ,(rad pink laser, Phil K.!)even though Jesus wept crocodile tears to Vangelis music from the Gladiator movie
Steady, steady
A lot of valuable information and interesting points. But the 'map' build up from this looks as premature, dogmatic and unverified as most other belief-systems in circulation. Do I detect a 'gurutrip' as a motivating factor?
Personally I prefer to make a critical examination of ALL the postulated 'facts', before I would make a finished 'map'. It's tempting to make a belief-system based on a certain amount of sound information, and then by retorical force sneak less obvious parts into it. Filling out the 'white spots' of the map with fundamentalistic assumptions.
Having a leaning towards an intellectual PAGAN gnosticism (and a good practical knowledge of applied 'walking the territory') I find the Jesus-parts far too indigestable. And some of the symbolic interpretations also seem questionable.
When meeting white spots on the map, some Agnosticism maybe would be more suitable, instead of a mixed Jesus, astrology and new-age spirituality approach.
YES!
Christianity as Other
In this growing community of ours, I've met a few people who react to Christianity as the Other--they immediately polarize upon hearing the word. The terrible truth is that Christianity is deep within all raised in the Western world (as you noted, it is in our language, our grammar, our scientific models), and our adverse response reflects a reluctance to face the inescapable world inside us.
Thank you for the reminder that we can learn from that worldview, if we sort through to the deeper universal truths deliberately hidden in the Gospels, both Orthodox and Gnostic. Christianity is a huge stone in our bellies, and we must transform that stone if we want to rid ourselves of its painful weight. The beautiful point is that Christianity itself offers the keys to such a transformation, as given in the quotes you've presented.
This is an old blog post of mine, but I think it's appropriate and points at the importance of confronting Christianity, not as adversaries or believers, but as independent seekers, to discover what lurks in the secret heart of a picture that came to dominate the Western imagination:
The establishment knows only to handle subversion by incorporating it. We've centered Western Civilization on a man famous for saying, This is not my Kingdom. At the heart of our culture is a contradiction we can confront only with great courage and patience. The root of everything we know whispers, Everything you know is a lie.
'Everything you know is a lie.'
everything beyond everything
my post was utterly incomplete without your final phrase. I could've left it with your words, which corrected and swallowed me and others I'm sure, but I want to express my gratitude, this feeling of expansion, for your reminder, your calling my mind back to the only thing beyond everything. You must be an angel, if I can make use of the Christian cosmology. Thank you.
And thank you, Jonathan Phillips! This is a spectacular article, and I'm sure the book will be illuminating.
"The beautiful point is
"The beautiful point is that Christianity itself offers the keys to such a transformation, as given in the quotes you've presented."
Thanks, Michael for your thoughtful insights. And we'll get more ito the "keys of transformation" further along. This first chapter is just a taste to give some of the background history that many people aren't aware of. We'll be diving in to the actual "codes" of Christian and other spiritual traditions across the planet to show how they might be revealing messages to us about our own personal, and global, transformation.
Interesting article and a great start to the book
Jonathan, I really enjoyed reading this.
One question I have for you, though. Weren´t there a variety of gnostic schools that weren´t necessarily in agreement about some of the stickier issues---whether or not Jesus rose from the dead literally, whether or not the flesh is evil, various degrees of extreme asceticism, etc?
I could almost swear I remember reading, at some point, that many gnostics thought that the body was evil. I can´t resonate with that idea so much. The body, to me, seems a glorious part of evolution---perhaps less painful manifestations of consciousness are out there. Maybe.
But why sweat it while we´re still in the body?
I loved the part about the Council of Nicea.....a very very important point to make! Thanks for this great project.
And, in response to Bogomil. I think that an important part of any spiritual discipline is the idea that you are a reflection of your own vision and judgment.
If you see wishy-washy in gnosticism, then it might be important to examine the ways in which this vision is a reflection of your own journey or state of being.
There was a tone of cynicism or annoyance in your voice that I detected, but maybe I´m wrong.
Another thought.
Maybe gathering all of the facts is only necessary for someone who is attempting to answer a truth that is exhaustible, intellectually. Perhaps the truth of gnosis is not exhaustible? Experience of gnosis is the only true knowledge of gnosis, I think.
Also, a map does not walk the journey for us. A map, like the stars, CAN, but doesn´t always, illuminate the path.
Adam Elenbaas
Nice Question: Not an easy answer
Adam, this is a great question and not so easy to answer in a quick response in the comments section, nor in a one chapter summary about gnosticism. Early Christianity was thought to be extremely diverse, judging from the number of varying texts and schools (ie: Sethian, Valentinian, Syrian, Basildes, Maricion, etc), just as the variety of Mysteries schools were also very diverse.
As for the case of if Jesus literally or metaphorically rose from the dead, different circles seemed to have a varying spectrum of views, but what we often run into is the sense of possibilities for these, or seeing everything as archetypal energies/qualities. Perhaps that's why Jung was such a big fan of the Gnostics. Also, what has interested me more than the history is how the modern day Gnostics I know and often practice with don't seem to get hung up on wondering if Jesus was real or a "download" from some other place, or simply a story. It's like deciding if light is a wave or a particle - why not hold all possibilites? The same goes for the resurrection.
As for seeing the flesh as "evil," there were definitely schools that saw the material word itself, as well as the flesh, as a source of great suffering. But others were also more sexually open (they had female priests after all), and sexual morality didn't matter so much once one had overcome the illusion of constructions of "right" and "wrong."
Perhaps my favorite quote on the flesh comes from The Gospel of Philip. "Fear not the flesh nor love it. If you fear it, it will gain mastery of you. If you love it (become to attached to it), it will swallow and paralyze you." That seems to be a nice middle path for one to follow.
And to be honest, that's the wonderful thing I'm seeing in Gnosticism today. People are finding what works for them in these sacred texts and practices and updating them to our contemporary world.
Your response to Bogomil's comments match my own. The Electric Jesus will admittedly not serve as The Complete Guide to Gnosticism. I encourage him to read a number of the tomes out there on this vast subject. What I'm doing here is laying out the bare basics of the Christian Mystery tradition that we can use as springboard to show how the Christian traditions (like many religions across the planet) may have known about energy and its role in personal/global transformation of consciousness.
i never thought of Christianity
as "other" i wonder how that would happen, i thought of it, like it was programed into my child mind, as soon as i was 12 right after my first communion, you know you have to CONFESS!!!!, ah, hello!, this was taken from the Egyptian Book of Coming Forth By Day, otherwise known as the Book of the Dead.In which a ritual is performed known as "negative confession" But right after my first eating of the body and blood of christ, i began to see the world in different ways, religion just began to fall off of me like an old snake skin, but that is only the beginning, of losing my religion, I still had to lose it from deep in my psyche, those images that a child sees in books about religion, are still buried in there.SO one begins on a journey to lose religion and to find spirituality, and this goes on, but there are some who find an umbrella to get under, i was not one of those.But i did feel that psychedelic experience was a spiritual journey, so poetry came to me, through music and lyrics, listen to Dylan, Donovan, Leonard Cohen, we are seeing the religious texts become poetic now, but Donovan is more Celtic, no Bible symbology there, more pagan, and Leonard Cohen was influenced by Garcia Lorca, that gypsy inspired spanish poet. but i do not see Christian religion as other, "other" to me is a philosophical word.
other, is what we experience as gnosis, as logos, as the wyrd.As that river that Heraclitus was thinking of.Sometimes we don't know when other is happening as we speak, and it it is just some other person, saying some word, like cat, or bird, or tree, but as Tom Waits says, it has to be a chocolate Jesus.
wonderful
Accolades
Johnny, My ears have been perked towards Gnostic ideas since you first brought them up to me. Thank you for taking the time and energy to compile all of this information. Looking forward to delving into this line of ideology.
Fascinating Stuff!
Hi Jonathan,
Glad you're undertaking a book on this subject! I haven't delved into the Gnostic gospels yet, so I look forward to getting your full perspective. Between this posting and Adam Elenbaas's piece on "Exorcising Christ", there's a lot of fascinating ideas to mull over.
I am curious, though, if you have done much research into the claims made in Zeitgeist, Part One, which you've incorporated into your chapter here? When I was researching the Zeitgeist movie for Reality Sandwich, I came across a lot of conflicting information for many of the film's claims of Jesus's similarities to other deities/figures, the astrological connections, etc. It seems that Peter Joseph sourced the majority of this from a book called The Christ Conspiracy by Acharya S., and this book has been very controversial and critically examined itself. (Also, Acharya's guiding premise is that Jesus never existed, which I'm not sure you'd concur with.)
In the end, I didn't go through and fact-check each claim, but I encountered enough contradictory material to find Zeitgeist's neat and tidy Christian-astrological theorizing suspect. If you've gone through and found other supporting sources for this material, I'd be eager to look into them to satisfy my mind on it.
Keep up the good work and please continue posting your chapters as you go!
;)
st
Astrology & More
Hi ST,
Zeitgeist isn't known to be the most factual resource, but I thought they put most of the basic astrology together well and I was happy to see this finally mainstreamed. The relationship between Christmas, the soulstice, and the southern cross is pretty well known - the same with the precession of the equinoxes.
You can find the solstice info and correlation between the other mystery traditions in The Jesus Mysteries, which is a wonderful book (with a few flaws here and there). Also, "The Mysteries of Mithras: The Pagan Belief that Shaped the Christian World" by Payam Nabarz covers this in some detail.
I had problems with other bits of the movie, especially how they seemed to ignore the actual significance and importance of the initiation process within the mystery schools. I don't believe this is simply about astrology. The mystery schools seem to offer a process with very sacred rites (read the Gospel of Philip for this) that can lead to quite extraordinary states of consciousness. Beyond the historical errors, I felt the absence of this wisdom was the great missing element of the movie. But maybe Zeitgeist II or III will cover this. I hope so.
Gnostics not necessarily Christian...
I have recently finished the book "Not In His Image" by our own John Lamb Lash. One of the main revelations I gained from his scholarship is that Gnostics were adamantly ANTI -Christian.... I let him speak in his own words from one of his posts here on RS. http://www.realitysandwich.com/roots_our_gnostalgia
Worth a re-read for all who are interested...
"Responses to my previous post, "The Trap of Simulation," raise the tricky subject of "anti-cosmism." This is scholar's jargon for the presumed Gnostic view that matter is evil, the product of an inferior deity, and the human soul is a "divine spark" imprisoned in a mortal carcass. In this view, the aim of spirituality is to free the soul from material confinement so that it can return to a disembodied state in the Pleroma, the realm of the gods. In Gnostic-Christian syncretism, Jesus Christ is the central agent in this redemptive drama of escapism." "I say "presumed" view because an increasing number of scholars now regard Gnostic anti-cosmism as disinformation, and seriously wrong. This is not what the pagan mystics thought, but what was attributed to them by their Christian adversaries, themselves known for their hatred of this world, their fear of nature, and their loathing of the female sex. In other words, Gnostic rejection of the body and the sensuous world is a projection of misogynist world-hatred originating with the Church Fathers who condemned the pagan visionaries as heretics, and strove to eliminate them. Which they did, almost without a trace."
He finished his post with a great point: "Gnostalgia immerses us in the murk of old theological quandaries full of contradictions, stated in corrupt syntax. The viable path of Gnosis for today leads to knowing Gaia, because Gaia, the name we give to the living intelligence of the earth, is identical with Sophia, the fallen goddess of Gnostic mythology. Rather than indulge in Gnostalgia, how can we enter the co-evolutionary path blazed by those ancient seers? Rather than bicker about what Gnostics said, when do we begin to practice our own Gnosis? It's a question those of us who are seriously attracted to Gnosticism all have to face, sooner or later."
One way or another - I wanted to add to the conversation.
Bottom line - the only thing we really need to focus on is practicing Gnosis, here and now!
Practicing Gnosis Here & Now
"Bottom line - the only thing we really need to focus on is practicing Gnosis, here and now!"
Totally agree with you on that. And I'm sure John Lamb Lash would as well. He has a very controversial and unique take on Gnosticism. Sophia is almost universally thought to be a female emanation from the divine realms. She's in the heavenly aeons and falls from grace to the material world. His view of her as a Gaia consciousness seems to contradict the view in this tale that the material world (and even earth itself) is lost in illusion and suffering (often created from Sophia's own mistakes). But she is a heavenly essence, the divine spark (or energy as I would say) that brings her/us back home.
I admire JLL's take on Gnosticism, mainly because he views it in his own contemporary eyes and reconstructs it to his own personal gnosis that he can share with us. I'll be doing the same, but this will be focused on how Jesus knew all about spiritual energy. I'm not sure this has been done before but it's another attempt to "practice Gnosis here and now."
muddy waters
Hi Adam E, you write: "If you see wishy-washy in gnosticism, then it might be important to examine the ways in which this vision is a reflection of your own journey or state of being.
There was a tone of cynicism or annoyance in your voice that I detected, but maybe I´m wrong."
Maybe I didn't make myself clear, but I AM partly gnostic, at least intellectually. So I do not find it wishy-washy. But you got the annoyance right. What I see here, is another example of christianity's standard approach of annecting an autonomous religion, making this other "pagan" religion a part of christianity. After which everything can be arranged according to christian doctrine and conditions.
Being in the position, that I want to find a 'spiritual' reality, as little hampered by official dogmas as possible, I distance myself from organised religion's uncompromising attitudes.
You are quite right, that there existed many gnostic varieties. Some of them older than christianity. In many of these variations of gnosticism, you would find a strong dualistic element concerning the quality of physical existence. These gnostics found universal existence a hoax, as parts of buddhism do (and as I do).
To return to the original article. If anyone actively starts giving out opinions, statements, information or postulates, s/he must be prepared to get a critical examination of 1/ the face-value of the opinions/statements made, 2/ the basic assumptions and methods used for arriving at such statements and 3/ the motives for giving them out publicly.
I personally question 1/ the value of the conclusions of the article. To make gnosticism and christianity meet more or less as one, a total redefinition of some of the most central theological points in both religions must be done. In this case it means that the result would be neither christianity, nor gnosticism, but some 'wishy-washy' hybrid. 2/ The epistemological part of getting to conclusions. Why in the name of the (un)intelligent designer should logic/intelligence be excluded from the process of staking out a map? Intelligence is neither better nor worse than any other of our methods for relating to life. It has its function, as emotions and body have theirs. That the final "being there" experience is not an intellectual experience goes without saying. 3/ As to the motives for putting out this article, I can't help noticing a strong missionary attitude. And I have a strong allergy reaction to missionaries. You never know, when they start pulling out their flaming swords to smite the ungodly.
The next post refering to John Lash is an example of how it is possible to have different opinions on a subject, but still have a meaningful communication. While my own search for a map/walking the territory doesn't give John's Gaia theory the same importance as he does, it is nonetheless a pleasure to read his opinions. I only have respect for his knowledge and his way of exposing it in an intelligent and constructive way. There's no 'soap-box' oration in his writings and he inspires to critical self-examination.
Lost in translation
there is a wealth of good
Had no idea...
When I began reading this well written piece, I had no idea what a thorny thicket this subject would become.
Careful, don't get scratched. I hear there's a drug in these thorns...
"If only I could remember the future"
thorns
there's God in them thar hills, there's gold in them thorns, roses in the blood that drops on the thick ground of being.
there's seeds in them mustards, roots in them horns.
there is bread and fishes in those who gather in the fields of the lord, there is stones to roll away from the cave entrance,
there,is, a, lost, word, that sits there in the depths of the cacoon prone form, waiting to be spoken, over its larval shape, waiting to be awoken from the sleep of shalom.
there is a whirlwind voice sweeping the streets of the holy town tonight, and tomorrow we take Rome,
there is a honeycomb way up on a presipice that calls its psalm from the river of golden tongue that pours over the world like a mighty song, like a wave of healing peace and a calm in the storm,
there is a ring of thorns, that once was the spirals in the crown of leaves, that spoke to the scented breeze of paradise in the middle of the circle of stones,
there is a gestation of gestures, that make the rounds through the heavens and walks the paths on the mounds,
standing there to charge the sacred place, to smote the silence for the answer to the prayers, and he looks out at the crowd, but its to the ragged sky that he stares, to the distant wild blue abyss, that his call is met,
the azure veil is torn, the thorn is taken from its side, as the words water the wound, and then it is done, the wind rises in the east, the yeast has been prepared in the last feast of the senses, dimensions burst assunder, thy will be rungs
all the past tenses, all the rent rituals of the precise sounds coming from that holy of holy, now becomes a rumbling thunder of floods spoken from the scralled on heart.
and the lips of the Nile do part the red see.a bird is let lose from those Isis thighs, she sighs, and the babe flies to its yonder star, her flower is born, and the thorn is worn with the seed, the lions and the lambs the beggars and the thieves,
the sermon slowly draws its inspiration from the king of poets, from the wise and the wicked twists and turns of the language that snakes from deep in the mounatin of the treasure of treasures, the measure of measures, the means of means, the green of green.
Thorns and nice, warm fires.
It's no wonder, that this subject is a little touchy. The steps between individual choice of religion, to missionaries and mad prophets to inquisitions, crusades and jihads are sometimes not so big.
I will not deny any person the right to an individual religion, or critizise her/his choice. But the organised abramic religions have a story of conquests, war and suppression behind them, so it's natural that we, who are sympathetic to gnosticism, are wary.
What the church did to the medieval gnostics, can easily be compared to what the nazis did to the jews. It was genocide, where people were tortured and burned. For their own sake ofcourse.
So when I meet religious enthusiasm, which is badly supported by the balancing influence of rational thinking, there's always the chance, that unbridled emotionalism will turn into fundamentalism, and such people will start looking for matches very quick.
The example isn't that unrealistic. We see religious fundamentalism running amok all the time.
Very few people with humanitarian ideals would be passive members of a nazi-organisation.
The same way persons with an abramic religion must be careful about, what they loan their name to. Even perform some self-criticism to see, if their attitudes could justify new intolerance.
bogomi..contd
Bogomil, Some good points. We must each choose which map we will use, if we use one. Scrutiny becomes important. But I really doubt that Jonathan is on any missionary trip. His intentions, to me, seem very loving and pure. I think it´s a little extreme to push the issue into any personal perceptions or another´s intentions. Such a miry muchole to gunk around in, right?
Being an ex fundamentalist-evangelical, I think it´s important to remember that even while I held very extreme, elitist ideas, I spent time purely loving the dying, the poor, and others, without any ulterior motive. We should try to see the texture in everything, right? We´re always more than our ideas.
Still. I like your point. Room for scrutiny is good.
Adam Elenbaas
Spreading the Good News
You know, I think Bogomil might be a little right about this piece having a "missionary" quality. As Jesus says, "spread the gospel ("good news") and to me that seems to be the not-so-secret meaning of universal love and transformation from this mystical tradition.
I come from the standpoint of an energy healer and when you see energetic blocks in a person, a community, or even a society, your compassion compels you to want to help. And I think many of us see there are some major blocks and deep wounds from the history and idealogy of certain Christian institutions. So when I found out about the orginal meaning and significance of these traditions, I wanted to come out and share that with people. And it has created quite a healing effect. In our Gnostic circle, I've seen former Fundamentalist or Catholic church members able to accept and open up to a part of their history that they had once been conflicted about.
The Good News: Logos, Word
The materialization or attempts to reduce the life and teaching of Jesus to a "historical" sense, rather than a living vibration that shatters the harshness of mere physical history, is what separates and disempowers the heterodoxy surrounding the "Christ" concept.
Soon you have the exact same thing happening amongst so-called "followers" of Jesus that transpired amongst the inheritors of the Mosaic or traditional "faith" of Moses.
It is possible to see the story of the error of Aaron and the forming of a "golden calf" as a polite or apologetic exegisis of a story of people forming a statue of Moses himself, Moses being the "cow of plenty", a traditional idea even extant at this day amongst Hindus and part of the Mother-Goddess cult of Maya and Laxmi. Perhaps they formed an image of Moses sitting on such a cow. Who knows. It would only be relevant to deep readers of all religious traditions and taking account of language itself.
But the idea is the basis of the word. Why should we feel resentment at the idea that a truth is born in the written word, without any connection to physical reality as such? The "voice" is recognisable. It is a tone and a feeling we can sympathize with, and recognise as our own, and something we can have faith in, because its directions are, when followed, conducive to good. To goodness.
The "gnostic" concept reflects an inner perception that is faithful to only one thing: inner connectivity or identification. No outer image or person can ever be anything but a neighbor or friend or family relation: read equal....ultimately.
The inner Self, I AM, is always IDEAL, stands back from personal choices that may be deemed by the world as mistake, but this I AM doesn't reject us. We come to think we rejected the ideal in favor of the outer "temptation" or trend of limited thinking and motive. It is a "refuge" because of restraint and disinterest. It is impersonal until communed with and adopted as the ideal of oneself. That is a pact, a kind of marriage. I believe this is the marriage meant by the word of Jesus as touching divorce. And furthermore, about "when two touching on any one thing agree, it will be done". It is the union of inner and outer. When the without is as the within, the kingdom is come.
The stream of this idealism began to evolve in writings. It was born in the WORD, and the Word was good. It is a voice as we understand it even today in concepts of literature and style. It is unitary and unitive or conducive to a cognisanse of harmony and internal consistancy that overcomes by laws similar to those that inhere in the science of music. It is self-editing, and destroys those vibrations that, if carried forward, could only be counted as noise and anti-coherant.
I believe that Jesus did exist, and was one who experienced this concept personally and who actually had to learn, and had to reject much that had been imposed on his outer mind while he held to his own direct, first-hand experiences. Often with much resistance to those closest to him and whom he loved, but whose trend of thought tended to what he hated: limitation and death. He experienced the potency of the "sustain" peddle on a piano, and could see that some thoughts had to be sacrificed and fully rejected to fully experience the potency of other thoughts. The thoughts of his own soul, which he called his "Father".
I think it highly likely he chose to call this principle his "father" out of a real sense of loss and sadness from losing his "earthly" father. It was a compensatory thing, maybe even a kind of denial. But his aim was ultimately to save even the dead, the lost. He denied it as "permanent", but extolled the ideal: life, the individual is permanent and indestructible. There is only one thing to do: solve your personal problem here and now. You can put it off forever if you choose, but eventually you must tire of the same old same old and truly burdensome curse of a bad idea or ideal.
This makes such an one as a Jesus an exemplar par excellance, but not an object of worship. If there is internal consistancy in this mode of conduction of an ideal into the future as I see it, it is maintained in Revelations, in the last chapter, where Jesus is talking to the writer of that work, and this man begins to bow to "Jesus' Angel", which is what many today say is the same as "The Angel of Yahweh", meaning Jesus. Fine, if you think that way, then it was Jesus Himself who said: be sure you don't do that, for I am as you a brother and fellow seer.
And the entire language of that book and much of the scripture pertains to the nature of thought and sentiment and has no ligitimate place in literal thinking as in trying to visualize a building coming down from outer-space or the sudden translation of a segment of humanity because they "confessed" a spoken word or name.
I believe we have to approach these things philosophically and with faith in our own intelligence. And seeing that intelligence as a kind of cooperation between an inner and outer form, but not separate as what we distinguish between ourselves and another individual or neighbor or even family member. Our inner Voice sees with a vantage point that is as high above our outer voice as the stars are above the earth. This message was never intended, I believe, to convey that we cannot understand. The intent of that is to say what resource we have by coming to know and commune with that as our most intimate Friend. Our true "soul-mate". It is the Divine Marriage that is implied throughout the Gnostic texts, and even in the truly medial texts of the synoptics and John, especially. The message is about the potency of true co-operation and/or Union. True Yoke, or yoga.
It is the thing "closer than breathing, nearer than hands and feet" that Tennyson spoke of in The Higher Pantheism. The only lighter part of that rather dark poem. It is the only part of that poem that survives in general consciousness because it is the ascendant truth. That is what I deem as the definition of "transcendental". The truth begins as a pure stream but picks up pollutants on its path to the sea. This is the path of idea into human or practical awareness. Personal ideas, or relative interpretations are imposed upon this stream, and, though it emanates from all, and all know it, by outer and dominant individuals, the false parts are exalted as if equal with the truly higher or innermost part the child in us understands and loves and delights in. And that is the mortal part that dies, and goes away. In other words, these "words" decompose, they don't move forward. Fall out of usage. Become defunct. But we know what is meant by a 'clarion' voice. We hear it every day in the gleeful noise of children on a playground. It is a voice that hates death, old age, limitation.
So I despise the idea that Gnosticism means that the "upper chamber" meant only a higher function of the brain, and that Jesus never ate meat or lived amongst men and overcame physical death. The message of Jesus is so potent because it promises something beyond mere idealism in idea only. It must have translation into real effect or practical efficiency. It becomes onerus only when it becomes sequestered to some one person only, or some sect of followers of some one person, or is somehow not the potential of all and all one.
I see that as our true motto: all one. One for all, All for each or one, the individual. Otherwise, egoism becomes a real snake that tells the outer mind that the outer mind can rule the inner voice, and that one can live without a conscience. This is the material or mortal concept. Utterly dependent on the gross mechanisms of invention and marshalling of outer forces to personal will. And the most fierce will rule. Bad idea. The curse of the outer kingdom. Slavery. Mortal and ugly.
=========== Letter writing is still the most potent way to raise the consciousness of elected representatives: it's a record they cannot ignore and cannot say they were unawar
Beliefsystems
Adam E,
thanks for your comments, which I agree with. One of my mainpoints is, that even a passive beliefsystem, unsupported by a common ground for communication, very easily can turn into an intrusive attitude. If you go out with a 'message', you must be prepared to support it and accept criticism. Otherwise it's just another crusade (in the broadest sense of the word).
I can give a few examples from my own life, so as not to attack anybody.
I have been a moral vegetarian for more than 40 years, but I keep a distance from vegetarian organisations, which even passively would encourage militant vegans (they are doing some incredibly unintelligent things occasionally).
My political ideal is anarchy, but I doubt it would function practically at the present. It would probably be used as an excuse for some extremist economic ideology, where the aim is to grab, what you can. Or justifying the individual sociopath for ignoring all social decency. So I don't support anarchistic organisations.
My position here isn't to spread any gnostic, unsupported views. It is to defend a right to communication on equal and common grounds.
It's very easy to send out speculative or halfbaked ideologies. But it's not as if we're short of 'gurus', messiases, etc at the present. I don't feel the need of any more.
Maybe it's time for people to start thinking for themselves. Sometimes based on TWO-WAY communication processes.
TWO-WAY Communication Processes--Yes!
THAT'S what i'm talking about...two-way communication...on line in comment boxes is great, but part of the RS social network should be to expand into video, live chat and lifecasting so that we can have these exchanges as conversations. How cool would that be? I'm imagining a multimedia gallery space, kinda like the wild project where we stream live onto the innernets day to day conversations and interactions with whoever swings by. that would be awesome!
jp
The Narrow Way
Their names were Denny and Ben
On my mind was a fairway
Straight through
And I’d reach my destination
A wedge was grabbed my red bag
As a man in a cart wheeled past me
Denny asked if would like to play along
The man said he certainly would
A foursome was now complete
It happened on the third valley tee.
The man in the cart was heavy
He was bigger then plump
Dressed in all gray
He stood slumped
He had a long beard
That wired down just below
The top collar of his t-shirt collar
A one horn rhino printed on it’s front
In his hat was an American Flag
Pinned by the words Holy Cow
He said his name was Joe
What do you know
We shook hands
And then ready to go,
Denny then Ben teed off first
Ben was just shy of the green
Denny sliced his ball right clean
Ben’s went just to the left,
Mine went straight through
The narrow
Biting the green
It was a good shot for me
Denny and Ben gave congrats
Fat Joe said nothing
He only adjusted his ball
Then teed off
Slicing far-far too far to the right,
As he yelled loud an unholy curse
“God Dammit” he said
I began to walk forward
Straight through the fairway
Thinking about the narrow way
And the more I played the game
The more I learned from Joe that day
By what he thoughtlessly was saying
How awful he was playing
As he cursed every bad stroke
And talked as if war was a joke
As if flying body parts were funny
And he chattered so very much
You forgot what he was saying
And he kept us constantly waiting
As he searched for his lost causes
Like a fool in the tall weeds,
Screaming in the wide rough
”Hopeless! Absolutely hopeless!”
His luck only changing once
Landing him squarely on the fairway
But then he cheated for a better lie
And it went on like this
The whole time we played
Until Denny and Ben had enough of
The unholy cursing
And left after the sixth tee.
I just couldn’t leave
There was more to learn
And a better game I have never played
My mind focused through the blessed narrow
And I thought it’s all about pure attitude
And if you have it in you…
Your longitude will be in line
Your latitude less wider,
A destination is better reached
And not too far off par
If one wonders not far off a fair way
Smiling ended my game only six over
As I reached down to retrieve my best game ball ever
And glanced at Joe positioning on the last green
I quit following his game after to many cursed swings
And he was about to end without a score card score
As one piece of advice was given
“The only way to play, Joe, is in the narrow.”
I said as he was about to putt his last stroke
And he cursed again as his ball rolled past the hole
”In the narrow, Joe,
it’s the only way in life to also go.”
He didn’t even play out the game
Just picked up his kicked ball
Said goodbye and tanks
Hopped in his cart
And drove away.
Later, that evening
I wondered upon a star
It gives man direction
True and due north
It’s longitude is always in line
It’s latitude is never off course
Dwelling on my own life, I thought…
Fools live in the rough of impure cursing
The wise live in the way of pure blessing,
The narrow way -- the unchanging fair way,
happy are those who enter through it,
for they shall one day see The Maker
and their score joyfully read…
Didn’t Jesus say something like that?
Today is part of forever.
that gnostic image