First, Love Yourself
Wendy Strgar
I have been thinking about self-love lately, and not just the emotional kind. I just learned that the month of May was recently named National Masturbation month. Certainly it is a topic that could do with a little airing out, if based only on its checkered history alone. It wasn’t all that long ago that boys were tortured with all kinds of strange contraptions to stop them from experiencing the terrible act of masturbation that was sure to make them blind or insane. Hard to believe, but the most educated people around perpetrated these myths in the form of medicine for years. It has been ugly indeed, and the church damning anyone who ever thought of self-pleasure to eternal hell didn’t help.
Cultural myths die hard and the history of abuse that has long been attached to the practice of physical self-love still carries a heavy doses of guilt, shame and anxiety with it for many people. Even without much religiosity in your life, the act of self-pleasuring carries an enormous silence. As I have been studying the topic, I can tell you it only takes saying the word out loud to silence a crowd.
Feeling isolated and alone with our sexuality is standard in America. The little sex education that is provided through adolescence is an exercise in naming body parts at best, and in some institutions is a drawn out diatribe of abstinence theory and the sinfulness of sexuality in general. Scholars have suggested that “the forbidden fruit” that is referenced from Adam and Eve is the experience of orgasm, so it is not surprising that this first gate of knowing and loving ourselves through masturbation has been continuously affirmed in most religions as sinful.
Yet this is not the state we are born into – if you have ever watched a small child explore their own body and the look of happy surprise when they discover the highly enervated erogenous zones that have no other meaning than pleasurable sensation, it is clear that the shame and discomfort that replaces this healthy curiosity is part of our collective education, to which we are all subjected, even as it ranges in severity depending on your own family’s reaction to sexuality in general.
Anna Freud famously wrote that “sex is something you do, sexuality is something you are.” Imagine the dinner time discussions in her home. This distillation of her father’s lifelong inquiry into sexuality is meaningful in this conversation about masturbation because it recognizes the essential truth, that we are all sexual beings. The degree to which we are driven by this part of our nature is as variable as is the way each of us interprets and acts on this part of our human nature. But between the recent scandals in the church between priests and kids, and the damaging sexual relationships that so many people live victim to, I think it is fair to say that we have come to the point where we might rethink and embrace the idea and practice of healthy self pleasuring.
Indeed, there are many sexual educators and therapists that consider the ability to self-pleasure as the cornerstone of sexual health. Not really a stretch to consider that a large percentage of the sexual dysfunction that so many people suffer from might easily has begun with the shame and anxiety about touching oneself. There is a clear correlation between the degree of guilt that early physical curiosity met and the ability to experience sexual pleasure in adult life. Finding comfort with our sexual selves is one of the most genuine, intimate and life affirming ways we can know ourselves. It is the first gate of understanding for both the raw experience of pleasure and the root of our primary sexual identity which is so basic as to be prerequisite to a fulfilling sexual relationship with others.
Just for the record, masturbation is the most common sexual practice on the planet. It's not just for lonely people, either. Survey research shows that people of all ages masturbate both in and out of relationships. Kinsey’s survey found that almost 40% of men and 30% of women in relationships masturbated. A study of Playboy readers found that 72% of married men masturbated, and a study of Redbook readers found that 68% of married women masturbated. Even given those statistics, many people feel they have to hide this behavior from their partner.
One of the best reasons to let go of all the judgment and history surrounding this normal sexual behavior is because having access to your own pleasure and orgasm teaches a profound inner lesson, which is that your orgasm is your own. No one else gives it to you or has power over you having it. Having the knowledge and confidence to know what feels good to you allows you the space and courage to share that most intimate information about yourself with someone else. Accepting the full responsibility of our own sexual nature, needs, and preferences is the gift you bring to a healthy sexual relationship with someone else.
So take the time this month to love yourself, feel your body and be grateful for all the sensations that you experience. Just for this one month, see what it feels like to call this part of yourself normal and welcome in the comfort of being a sexual human being.
To learn more about this topic, take a look at this website.
Image credits: "Toqueteo 1" by Sorgin; "alright .. so there was some love for the tower" by Marshdude; and "1979: Fabbriciuse learns masturbation" by Fabbriciuse, under Creative Commons license.
- Wendy Strgar's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version




Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Propeller
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Icerocket
A very touching piece
Propaganda Anonymous
I've noticed this about sexuality and sex and stuff,
Lots of people are weirded out by other's talking about their sexual selves, when these talks are not some form of flirting from one to the other.
Or in the context of say 'therapy'
Or shared between close friends.
Talk abut sexuality, I've noticed, tends to be encoded in a multi-language full of jokes, similes and metaphors.
There are socially 'ok' ways of talking about sex, and there are those things that just freak people out.
If I invoke Marcuse, Reich, Osho, Havelock Ellis, Henry Miller all this socially shamed based behavior seems retarded.
Yet the 'irrational' tugs and weighs us all down from time to time, however I find Reich's integration of theories in forming the basis of his argument that says the integration of well functioning and fulfilling sexuality aids in the appreciation and understanding of 'work.' and life.
I'm so down with nearly all progressive 'theories' like these.
I also see that I live in a country where the government, under Clinton no less, fired it's Surgeon General, Joycelyn Elders, because she spoke about the importance of alllowing kids to masturbate.
" In 1994, she was invited to speak at a United Nations conference on AIDS. She was asked whether it would be appropriate to promote masturbation as a means of preventing young people from engaging in riskier forms of sexual activity, and she replied, "I think that it is part of human sexuality, and perhaps it should be taught." This remark caused great controversy and resulted in Elders losing the support of the White House. White House chief of staff Leon Panetta remarked, "There have been too many areas where the President does not agree with her views. This is just one too many."[1] Elders was fired by President Clinton as a result of the controversy in December of 1994"
Sexuality is just interesting in general, though.
We're all such funny little creatures man.
Thnx for the piece Wendy
'There are socially 'ok'
'There are socially 'ok' ways of talking about sex, and there are those things that just freak people out.'
I agree, if you talk about kundalini for instance, which I think is sexual energy, it is all quite respectable. I think there is a strong correlation between sexual and spiritual energy that is not really acknowledged, sex is still regarded as somewhat sinful, as is the use of entheogens.
Slick Willy
hmmm
I'll go ahead and say something controversial. I think that many Americans are addicted to orgasms.
Recent studies have shown that the dopamine addiction associated with orgasm is rampant (and is followed by the release of prolactin). I believe orgasms are healthy, but I also believe that much of the world masturbates compulsively.
In the long run studies are showing that this creates long term associations between orgasm and the crash or low that can follow. It often takes more to get high.
Negative associations made between the neuro-chemical low following an orgam and a frequent sexual partner can breed resent in relationships.
This resentment is often followed by the desire to seek out other partners (less associations and projections are found in new partners). In my view, polyamory is often thought of as a high-virtue in spiritual communities because it's thought to be "more honest."
But it seems to me that this is, at its worst, like a methadone clinic for the orgasmically addicted. Withholding orgasm in relationships, as well as delaying orgasm, bi-passes a perhaps viral urge to procreate 24/7.
Procreation is beautiful. Don't get me wrong. Orgasm is beautiful, too. I'm not suggesting a prohibition of orgasm.
But I think that the sexual bravado in spiritual communities is often nothing more than a mask for a deep seated compulsive behavior that might need sorting out (not for everyone of course, but I think for many).
I also think it's worth considering that not all of the longest standing ideas about orgasm are terrible, divisive or fear-based. Many ancient cultures knew of the benefits of delayed or withheld orgasms for the sake of intimacy.
In some Jewish cultures it was suggested that a couple be physical but only orgasmic once every month, for example. Perhaps some of the ancient cultures realized that some of us (not all) crash hard emotionally and spiritually if we "cum" too often.
So there. I've said my bit! Of course----what isn't great about masturbation. I make no prescriptions...only some more food for our reality sandwich!
Adam Elenbaas
:)
Trenchant comments, Adam...
For another perspective, consult Jack Dangers.
Yes, but...
Stephen, I
Stephen,
I completely agree with you. I think we have two things at work here. One--an unhealthy repression of sexuality that happened---victorianism, religiosity, etc. Two--we have a backlash to the opposite extreme.
Adam Elenbaas
Yes, but...
Bravo, Adambass
Hi Adam, thanks for providing a cogent counterpoint. Aside from wondering why we need to waste column space discussing masturbation (since we all do it, and according to you, a bit too much) I'm one of those non-evolved people who think that polyamory, for the most part, is just a synonym for the compulsive, pathological need for promiscuity and the attention it brings, and the equally paralyzing fear of committment.
Sex today is a ping-pong game between the poles of decedent porn sex and the H.M.O. (high maintenance orgasm) practices of the sexually neurotic and dysfunctional. It's a miracle we can get together at all.
Of course, this could be nature's way of thinning the herd. Dropping all your baby batter on the ground used to be a sin; now it's just a sign of (de)evolution.
And I must be the most devolved person on earth. >;0)
Charles Shaw
Evolver/Reality Sandwich
Continuing Adam's thoughts
I've been finding myself thinking a lot about polyamory recently and have also been battling my own compulsions/shames of masturbation for what seems like centuries.
Just last night I had an orgiastic vision with both men and women - something I've never had before and though I felt it was intensely beautiful and love-based rather than falsely sexual - it has really got me thinking even more about these subjects and what I'm supposed to do about my sexuality. I, too, think with you Adam, that orgasms are beautiful things but clearly tantra teaches us that there are more powerful uses to sex than orgasming and by withholding our orgasms we can certainly increase our vitality.
Basically, what I'm thinking about doing and wondering if any of you have any experiences with, are combining tantra (a practice that clearly demands a necessary strong relationship with just one partner) and polyamory (being in a relationship that may be tantracally demanding demanding, while still being open to other loves/partners and perhaps other tantric demands as well). I'm not sure if any of this is possible/realistic/ridiculous... but it certainly seems like it might be a path for sexual and spiritual freedom to join together in the love of all that apparently needs to occur here in our cultural world.
Thoughts?
All bridges can be rebuilt.
agreed
In theory I think your idea could work.
In practice...seems unlikely for my own situation. I might be naive, but I crave a life-long partner. I'm a monogamous dude. I still daydream about soulmates, love at first sight, and a relationship that doesn't end in divorce.
Right now, for example, I feel bound and determined to withold from orgasm with the next woman I date until marriage. And after that I don't want orgasms very often.
All the neuro-chemistry is there for the taking. After we release this huge amount of dopamine with ejaculation (someone rightly pointed out that it's ejaculation and not orgasm per se), and the prolactin, it takes 1-2 weeks for our brain to reach homeostasis again.
During that hangover period the symptoms are there. It's like withdrawing from a drug. You resent your partner, blame them for your own low, perceive them, often literally, as less attractive: "how did I get into bed with that creature?"
The funny thing is that it was Ayahuasca plant spirits who showed me this wisdom during a ceremony a year ago. Then I stumbled onto the books synchronistically when I got home.
For me, it's not celibacy. It's physicality without "end based" thinking. It's sexuality without the "wham bam thank you ma'am" that leaves me feeling shitty and resentful of my partner.
It's longer sex. It's feeling connected afterwards. There's even research that suggests that we build positive associations with our partner and more seratonin transmitters/transponders (can't remember which) by witholding ejaculation.
When it comes down to it:
I refuse to be dominated by my desire to make a million little Adam's!
And I'm no doctor. I hold no judgments. But no orgams----I think it's the shit.
Because it seems SO universal that people resent their mates and want someone new after repeated orgasms with one partner. Look at the population of the planet!
People are talking about all of this gloom and doom. Perhaps we're missing one of the larger culprits?
I have to laugh when people talk about aliens and lizards and all this hostile takeover---things hijacking our dna, archons who want to annihilate us, etc.
I met this woman while I was in Peru two weeks ago drinking Ayahuasca. She was a really nice woman. But she was ranting about how the lizards have taken over our brains, telling me her whole theory of the universe, and she looked like she wanted to molest my face and create a baby with me while she was talking about the lizards. She was SO impressed with this grand, reptilian theory. And she was really horny.
There was something WAY too seductive and self-impressed about her voice. Maybe the people who are into the crazy reptile stuff are simply lost and horny? I want to talk about the possibilities.
How has orgasm addiction infiltrated the way the spiritual community is thinking about things like 2012, etc? What if the whole "reptilian" overlord thing is nothing more than a largely imagined scheme from people who are dominated by ejaculation addiction?
When I thought about the woman in Peru, I was like, "Of course your ideas about reptile, viral takeovers would feel both compulsive and sexual---seduced by itself."
(smiles---sorry, that was kind of cynical)
Even people just talking about global warming, though.
Perhaps we have some sort of viral, or just biological, mammalian urge to bone, bone, bone, bone with as many people as possible, in order to push our species number higher and higher, to survive, to thrive, what else?
And isn't it also possible that this unhealthy version of the pro-creative urge doesn't serve our highest self, our highest possible manifestation of love and peace?
As the population has risen, have addictive and unhealthy compulsions risen too? The answer seems to be yes.
Porn tends to objectify people and sex (in my experience). I don't see masturbation as right or wrong, but it simply doesn't feel as good to me any longer as sharing space with someone I love and letting life itself feel erotic.
That's not a metaphor. This perception is the result of hard work that I've done sexually to free myself of a serious ejaculation addiction. I truly believe this on the clean end of my own addiction-----Life is erotic.
Once in a while it's fun to get blasted, but homeostasis is underrated in our "blow my wad, blow my mind, now, now, now," culture.
My own personal experience with polyamory also suggests that it was nothing more than my most honest way of dealing with orgasm addiction and the lows that make me resent one single partner.
Still, I'm not stupid enough to think I have all the answers here.
But I will admit that I have built up resent for all the articles I've read tauting polyamory and masturbation, etc, etc, as SO enlightened. Perhaps this is my own projection, but I think a lot of that stuff is just hokem.
I sometimes resent the flippant, "I'm so pleasured," attitude that these articles take towards what can be a very serious and sickly dependency that many people have underneath the surface of their sexual/spiritual issues.
Live and let live. I liked this article and take no real issue with it. The intentions seem pure.
But hey....a plant teacher in the jungle told me that all this stuff, for me, the polyamory, the failed dating relationships, the masturbation, the porn, was just a mask for an addiction I had to blowing my wad!
:-)
Go figure! Life is so weird.
(sweet video ST! ----I'm going to Radiohead in Atlanta tomorrow night--must brag about that. I figured you might be there, too?).
peace--
Adam Elenbaas
'Life is erotic'
Be careful...
You asked for thoughts, doctordewey: “and have also been battling my own compulsions/shames of masturbation for what seems like centuries”.
Perhaps it HAS been “for centuries”?
I’m curious if a failure to accomplish a between life goal in successive lifetimes might create a tendency to overshoot the runway so-to-speak. Be careful. Don’t damage one good relationship in your desire to accomplish a long-anticipated landing by overshooting the runway.
Adam: Have you considered the possibility that the fundamentalist upbringing, you had previously revealed in another post, had influenced the onset of your “addiction” as a push-back reaction to Victorian sexual indoctrination?And, could your current ultra conservative attitude regarding orgasm be a subconscious effort to revisit, assimilate, and transcend that indoctrination, amplified by the emotional immediacy of your psychedelic experiences?
Please take my thoughts as an attempt to be helpful.
"everything means something"
Good thoughts
Don,
My fundamentalism didn't come until I was about eighteen years old, as a form of rebellion to my father, who was a universalist, Methodist Minister, after he had an affair (many women, many faces of God, no thanks).
So my upbringing was evangelical but also incredibly liberal. My mother was a sexual education teacher, and I enjoyed a very healthy understanding of sex, masturbation, etc, growing up.
Sex addiction came with fundamentalism, though, in just the way you've described. In fact, so did drug addiction, alcoholism, etc.
As a kind of backlash.
The second half of what you've said here is fascinating to me. I've thought about the irony, of course.
It's interesting to me that you use the phrase "ultra conservative."
My thoughts are simple, and to me, do not feel at all conservative (especially compared to the sternness of the plant maestros in the jungle that I've worked with for a few years now).
Orgasm addiction is a major sickness that is currently undiagnosed on the planet. I understand that this is a strong statement. But I don't see strong statements as necessarily close-minded or conservative.
It's remedy, for those who suffer from orgasm addiction, is simple: less orgasm and more intimacy without end-based physicality.
To me it's no more conservative than saying that our planet currently suffers from fear or anger.
Now, if I said that all orgasms are bad, or that everyone has a problem, then I'd see myself as "ultra conservative."
But I don't feel the need to be that prescriptive.
Still---to be truly open minded, there must be room for dogmatism, ultra conservatism, absolutes, prescriptiveness, and everything else.
The plant teachers are often very absolute and very concerete (other times they aren't).
I see our planet, in large part, suffering from an undiagnosed addiction. Doesn't mean that you do or that the next guy does. But I think lots of people do, and I feel this is no more ultra-conservative than it is to say that our economy is in rough, rough shape.
Still, I really do honor your wisdom, and I think it's possible that part of your perception about my background, me being an ultra conservative about this, etc, are very true.
There's room for for growth in how I am articulating my passion about this issue. I'm sure.
Also, you may percieve this as ultra-conservative as well, but I don't see my experiences with Ayahuasca (which is the only mind-altering 'psychedelic' I've used in the past three years) as psychedelic. I see them as medicinal.
My work with Ayahuasca is a part of a path that I believe is very absolute in one sense.
In another sense it's infinite and looped into relativity.
Adam Elenbaas
Orgasm is not the same as ejaculation
holding it...
also, masturbation and orgasm do not necessarily go hand in hand. someone could masturbate with no intention of "releasing," though that practice is probably rare.
i agree that there's a stigma against it, but in the eyes of many eastern traditions self-pleasure intensifies attachment to the senses and material life on earth. a buddhist monk masturbating wouldn't make sense because they are supposedly trying to escape the cycle of rebirth through non-attachment.
in some cases blocking that release can probably be harmful, but submitting to the urge all the time seems questionable. the line between embracing the senses and being addicted to sensory pleasure is a tough one to draw.
everyone struggles with it... having the control seems to be pretty important, and there's something to be said about "holding it." the sexual energy builds, and that can be channeled into all different places.
battles with lust...embracing the world...it's weird how masturbation could be thought of as both.either way, though, if it really wants to come out, it will. just wait for dreams.
agreed
I agree with you here on this one point. Masturbation without ejaculation seems possible and exciting!
"the line...is a tough one to draw"
amen--!
Adam Elenbaas
It is possible..
Masturbation without ejaculation is more difficult for men from what I read but it's not just possible it's simply a fact. Be open minded and experiment. It does feel awkward and even "wrong" at first (both of which are due to negative beliefs). It can also take a looooong time, and some men might never achieve orgasm without ejaculation... I'm not sure. From my experience, it's a bit like yoga or meditation. No quick gains. But then, the practice isn't difficult or unpleasant either! ^_^ One of the first things I learned, possibly the most interesting and it comes within a few weeks of experimenting, is that indeed, you can relieve sexual tension by masturbating and not coming... seems illogical doesn't it? This alone makes a huge difference to the way you masturbate. The arousal goes up and down and there is one moment where stopping is really easy. Other moments... requires practice and various techniques help move the sexual energy around. I really like the idea that you can use this "weakness" to grow and become more loving towards not just yourself but also everyone around eventually...
Self-love but for what?
great points
i'm all for men learning how to delay their ejaculation!i've been lucky enough to have that kind of relationship. it makes for a much more exciting sex life- longer sex, more orgasms, more cuddles and less passing out, none of that "disconnection" that can happen right after sex, or as Adam said, "resenting his partner." sex isnt about how great the finish will be, but how great it is to feel so connected, erotic and full of pleasure with the one you love.
i really agree with this article. self love to me is about deeply experiencing the pleasure of your physical body in love. you bring that awareness into a union and you bring a healthy foundation to your sex life. it also helps you to resist hopping into bed too soon with some guy you like, because you carry your sexual confidence within. women who are sensitive need to be careful, because the hormone they release after sex is oxytocin, the bonding hormone which actually creates a chemical addiction to the one they slept with. it can fool a woman into thinking she really likes someone when she doesnt. it can create that desperate and needy feeling when the guy doesnt want to bond. men dont release oxytocin as far as i know. and i know there are those women out there who dont have that problem, but i seriously have only met a few.
another little tidbit, vianna stibal, creator of theta healing, states that monogamy is gene based, and that not everyone has the monogamy gene. so perhaps the polyamory crowd are truly expressing their genes. as for me, i've got the monogamy gene and when i tried to be polyamorous it really backfired. but trying to be monogamous when you are really polyamorous can create the same level of discomfort.
and finally, orgasms are everywhere. not just during sex or masturbation. try opening your chakras while you jump up and down laughing with an excited crowd. get your body moving, and all your energy centers open and flowing, and bliss follows:)
More thoughts...
Orgasm and ejaculation without masturbation. Now THERE’S an interesting experience proving that it’s all in the mind. Lie perfectly still, and just make it happen!
nitelite: “men don’t release oxytocin as far as I know.”
I’m not familiar with all the chemicals as such, but the main reason I’m very fussy about who I fuck is that, afterward, I automatically feel responsible for their welfare. It would seem to be something in the design. Perhaps men who are less discriminating have learned how to ignore the effect?
"everything means something"
do yuppies
On mindful masturbation
heavenly above, so below
Orgasm Addiction and self-love
Firstly, men do release oxytocin- to much the same effect as with women. It makes you feel connected, mushy and lovely.
As for the orgasm addiction discussion- I think it's bogus. There is a refractory period with nearly every hormonal function. I am hungry -> I eat -> I am happy for a little while -> I crash -> I need to eat again.
Any hormone is technically a "drug" affecting brain function, so any behavior that stimulates the release of hormones could be considered "addictive."
Just because humans feel good when they cum, then feel less good because they are no longer cumming, doesn't mean orgasm is an epidemic that needs to be curbed. I believe that there are still WAY too few orgasms happening in this world. There are WAY too few women who know the function and location of their clitoris, and there are way too few men who know how to give pleasure to their wives/girlfriends. There are way too many female circumcisions happening because of fear and resentment towards female sexuality. There are way too many women who are told that they are dirty and gross and they should keep their hands away from themselves.
If we are relying on anecdotal evidence to support the addiction theory, allow me to say that I have NEVER felt "resentment" to a parnter after sex unless they expressed a strong disinterest in my pleasure at all. If they care about how I feel, I feel good. That's where the "after-sex glow" comes from.
As for the "spiritual community" theory- a whole hell of a lot of people end up in "spiritual communities" (whatever that means) because they have serious issues to begin with. I have no doubt that a lot of poly people and/or tantra people have serious problems with their sexuality and are function on a poverty complex, not from a place of bounty. But, that's just people. We're all imperfect, and we all allow our imperfections to hurt others if we don't check ourselves.
And finally, as for the poly proselytizer - they exist. But what are there more of? Monogamy proselytizers. They are different paths for different people- neither is better than the other.
The solution is not to deny orgasms, or to force them. We must be conscious of our sexuality, just as we should be for our eating, our sleeping, our consumption, our relationships, our thoughts. Just as we are careful not to overeat, we should exercise consideration in sex, too. But the idea that the entire world is "addicted" is myopic and dismisses the extraordinary gifts of sexuality and pleasure.
not myopic
It's not myopic. It's realistic, and it's a different message--one that many people need to hear. Sexuality and pleasure are not synonymous with orgasm. And orgasm is not synonymous with addiction.
Just because you have positive experiences doesn't mean that a mass of people are not having negative experiences.
Perhaps one reason for genital mutiliation and patriarchy in general comes from the chronic projection men addicted to orgasms have placed onto women after sex?
I want to talk about possibilities: chemically, spiritually, etc.
Adam Elenbaas